Specialist practice · AI Security
Federal agencies must migrate high-value systems to quantum-resistant key establishment by December 31, 2030 and digital signatures by December 31, 2031 — and a proposed FAR rule will extend the same deadline to federal contractors. Adversaries are harvesting encrypted data today to decrypt later. We help you find your cryptography, rank the risk, and plan a migration your engineers can execute.
You cannot migrate what you cannot find. We build a Cryptographic Bill of Materials covering applications, infrastructure, certificates, protocols, and third-party dependencies.
🔵 Discovery across code, configuration, PKI, TLS, VPN, and HSMs
🔵 Algorithm, key-length, and protocol mapping (RSA, ECC, DH, SHA)
🔵 CBOM aligned to emerging NIST and CISA inventory guidance
Not every system needs to move first. We rank exposure by data sensitivity, data lifetime, and "harvest now, decrypt later" risk.
🔵 High-value asset and high-impact system identification
🔵 Data-lifetime analysis against quantum timelines
🔵 Dependency mapping for vendors and shared services
A phased roadmap to NIST's post-quantum standards, designed so you can swap algorithms again when the standards evolve.
🔵 Migration to FIPS 203 (ML-KEM), FIPS 204 (ML-DSA), and FIPS 205 (SLH-DSA)
🔵 Hybrid and crypto-agile architecture patterns
🔵 Key management, PKI, code-signing, and TLS transition plans
🔵 Alignment to OMB migration-plan requirements and the 2030/2031 deadlines
Your cryptography lives in your vendors' products too. We review third-party readiness and write the contract language that holds them to a timeline.
🔵 Vendor PQC roadmap assessment
🔵 Procurement and contract requirements
🔵 Cloud provider and SaaS cryptographic posture review
Next step
A cryptographic inventory is the first deliverable every agency and contractor needs. We can scope one in a single call.
